After four decades of President Museveni’s rule, Uganda’s governance system has become increasingly centralized, with the president wielding unparalleled power. This has resulted in a lack of accountability, transparency, and effective management of the country’s resources.
The recent statement by Lord Mayor Erias Lukwago regarding the failed contract between KCCA and investors to generate electricity from waste in Kiteezi highlights the far-reaching consequences of this presidential dominance.
In a well-functioning democracy, the president is not the sole arbiter of decision-making. Instead, institutions and systems are in place to ensure that power is distributed evenly, and decisions are made through a consultative process. However, in Uganda, the president’s approval is often required for even the most mundane contracts, stifling initiative and innovation.
Good governance is about creating an environment where institutions, not individuals, drive decision-making. It’s about separating powers, ensuring accountability, and promoting transparency. In Uganda’s case, the concentration of power in the president’s hands has led to:
- Delayed projects and initiatives
- Lack of accountability and transparency
- Inefficient allocation of resources
- Stifled innovation and entrepreneurship
- Weakened institutions and systems
To break free from this cycle, Uganda needs to adopt a more decentralized approach to governance, where:
- Institutions are empowered to make decisions without presidential interference
- Clear policies and procedures guide decision-making
- Transparency and accountability are ensured through robust oversight mechanisms
- Power is distributed evenly among branches of government
- The president serves as a symbol of national unity, rather than a sole decision-maker
By adopting such a system, Uganda can:
- Attract investors and promote economic growth
- Improve service delivery and public goods provision
- Enhance accountability and reduce corruption
- Foster innovation and entrepreneurship
- Build stronger, more resilient institutions
In conclusion, Uganda’s over-reliance on presidential control has hindered effective governance and development. By transitioning to a more decentralized, system-driven approach, Uganda can unlock its full potential and create a brighter future for its citizens.
